The smart Trick of ejusdem generis case laws That No One is Discussing

The smart Trick of ejusdem generis case laws That No One is Discussing

Blog Article

If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only done When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded on the allegations therefore they were perfectly aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

A reduced court may well not rule against a binding precedent, even when it feels that it is unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. Should the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it could possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts in the cases; some jurisdictions allow for just a judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.

fourteen. During the light in the position explained previously mentioned, it truly is concluded that a civil servant features a fundamental right to get promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be thought of for no fault of his personal and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the length of service or inside the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as a legally regarded conviction. Read more

This is because transfer orders are typically deemed within the administrative discretion with the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more

Generally speaking, higher courts usually do not have direct oversight over the lower courts of record, in that they cannot access out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments from the reduce courts.

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support from the Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. Given that the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, the decision with the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. Read more

We are an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of regulation and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution and laws on the United States and this State.

Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common regulation, can be a law that is based on precedents, that may be the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.

162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is effectively-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. If your appeal check here is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the ninety days with the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we're guided by the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.

ten. Based about the findings with the inquiry committee, this petition is just not considered maintainable and it is therefore liable to be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more

Normally, only an appeal accepted from the court of very last resort will resolve these types of differences and, For several reasons, this sort of appeals are sometimes not granted.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.